Cookies on fenixpyre.com
We use analytics and marketing cookies to learn how the site is used and to follow up on enquiries. They stay off unless you accept. Privacy policy
CMMC compliance
The toughest part of certification — encrypting CUI and controlling access to it — becomes the quickest step. No migration, no enclave, no VDI. FIPS-validated encryption applied at the file, inside the workflows your people already use.
than migrating to Microsoft GCC or a CMMC enclave solution.
the platform is built and operated in alignment with — across all 14 control families.
forensic access reports support the reporting window required after a suspected exposure.
FIPS-validated encryption integrated into current workflows for Level 2 compliance.
Users handle CUI and non-CUI side by side on the same endpoints and servers, with controls set automatically for users, endpoints, applications and files — so you avoid compliance issues without disrupting operations.
CUI is FIPS encrypted at all times — at rest, in transit and in use. Combined with automated access controls, there is no need to implement a separate DLP solution to protect against CUI leakage.
Users can be trained in minutes because files open in native desktop applications inside existing workflows — including the most complex, like Revit, SolidWorks and AutoCAD.
Setup requires no CUI migration and no change to user workflows or processes. It integrates with your existing security stack: IAM, SIEM, SCIM and HSM.
Securely share and receive CUI with third parties directly from your endpoints, without setting up multiple accounts or migrating CUI into a cloud sharing platform.
Over 65% less expensive than migrating to Microsoft GCC or a CMMC enclave, and it avoids paying for Gov Cloud virtual machines or VDI environments just so users can open CUI.
Most contractors are quoted a migration. Compare what each path asks of your data, your people and your budget.
A CONTRACTOR’S EXPERIENCE
In this manufacturer’s
third-party gap analysis
We chose to implement PostAuth to protect CUI by applying the FIPS validation at the file level, rather than opting for a more expensive enclave solution.
This revolutionary approach allowed us to demonstrate that our controls and protections for CUI met CMMC compliance during a gap analysis conducted by a third-party CMMC assessor.
The assessor found no gaps or issues with this innovative method for handling and securing CUI.
NIST SP 800-171 / CMMC LEVEL 2
Choose a named family to review the control references and how PostAuth supports them.
POSTAUTH CAPABILITIES
Connect the way you protect CUI to the records and architecture your assessment team needs to review.
Build the evidence around
your actual environment.
The SaaS platform is built and operated in alignment with all 14 control families and 110 requirements — suitable for contractors preparing for CMMC Level 2 or DFARS 7012.
Per-file encryption keys, an HSM for master keys, and integration with your enterprise HSM infrastructure — for environments where cryptographic assurance is a compliance pillar.
Audit-ready reports are generated automatically, showing who accessed what, when and where, alongside cryptographic enforcement logs.
Every access attempt and failure is logged from any location, so a forensic access report can scope an incident fast and support the 72-hour DFARS 7012 window.
Exchange CUI with third parties while maintaining NIST SP 800-171 and DFARS 7012 compliance — encrypted in transit and at rest, with access control enforced post-transfer.
Files can be decrypted using your Customer Master Encryption Key at any point, which removes reliance on PostAuth for decryption.
Files stay where they are. Keys stay in an HSM. Only authorisation decisions and access events cross the wire.
On-premises shares, endpoints and servers keep the files. Nothing migrates to a government cloud tenant.
Opening a file triggers verification of user, device and application before any decryption happens.
Per-file keys are released from the HSM only when policy is satisfied. Master keys never leave it.
Grants and denials stream to your SIEM, forming the enforcement log an assessor asks to see.
Automated access controls let users handle CUI and non-CUI side by side on the same endpoints and servers — which is what removes the need for a separate DLP deployment and shrinks the risk of a mishandling violation.
Scoping is specific to your contracts and your estate — a 30-minute session with an engineer beats a doc.
Handling CUI generally puts a contractor at CMMC Level 2, which aligns to the 110 requirements of NIST SP 800-171. Level 1 covers Federal Contract Information only; Level 3 applies to a narrow set of programmes with the highest-priority CUI. Your contract language and DFARS clauses determine the answer for your organisation.
Implementation of all 110 NIST SP 800-171 requirements across 14 control families, evidenced by a System Security Plan and supporting artefacts. Encryption of CUI at rest and in transit using FIPS-validated cryptography, enforced access control, and auditable access records are among the controls assessors focus on most.
Scope the environment that stores, processes or transmits CUI, implement the controls, document them in an SSP with a POA&M for gaps, then undergo assessment — a third-party C3PAO assessment for most Level 2 contracts, with self-assessment permitted for a limited subset. A gap analysis before the formal assessment is the usual first step.
CMMC requirements are being phased into DoD solicitations, so the operative date depends on when your contracts are awarded or renewed and which phase applies to them. Contractors handling CUI today are already obligated under DFARS 252.204-7012 — check current DoD guidance and your contracting officer for your specific timeline.
Yes — that is precisely what scoping is for. Certification applies to the assessed environment where CUI lives. File-level encryption makes that boundary tighter: because protection travels with the file and out-of-scope users and devices cannot decrypt it, you can keep CUI and non-CUI work on shared endpoints without enlarging the assessment scope.
A System Security Plan, a POA&M for outstanding items, policies and procedures per control family, and evidence that controls actually operate — access records, cryptographic enforcement logs and configuration proof. PostAuth generates audit-ready reports showing who accessed what, when and where, which supplies much of that operational evidence directly.
Thirty days, your own CUI, your own CAD and Office workflows. No migration, no enclave, no change to how your people work.